Monday, December 29, 2008

Picture Question

If someone has professional pictures taken of their child who is 22 Months and 10 Days old could they count as 2 year old pictures (because perhaps they purchased SEVERAL of these pictures) or must that person shell out another hundred dollars for 2 year old pictures when the child has actually reached the age of two??

8 comments:

Yarian said...

I personally wouldn't pay more money if I had just had pictures taken because he probably won't change to much in the next two months. You can however do whatever is right for you but I thought I would give my thoughts.

Lynanne said...

His appearance won't change much in that short amount of time. I'd Count it as his 2 y/o photos and take your own on the big day. :)

Jessica said...

I think that is up to you! Will you look back and say "THOSE are his 22 month pictures" if not then I say use the ones you have!

OMH said...

I would count it as 2 year old picture - as long as I took ONE at least on my digital for my keeping.

Heck I've been known to take 2 year old pictures at 30 months and count them as 2 and 3 year old pictures..........it wasn't of my first born of cours - Sorry middle child!

kbreints said...

I would count it as two year old pics-- if you want to! If not-- go and get more taken... and if you want, I can take some "2" year old pictures for you too!

Laura said...

Hell yes they count.

Jen said...

Close enough. In ten years, nobody's gonna even know the difference. Heck, in 2 years, nobody's gonna know the difference.

Amanda said...

I say yes, they count...but I'm a hypocrite bc I was all uptight about Brooklyn's pics she had done the day before she turned 8 months not REALLY being 8 month pics.