Monday, December 29, 2008
Picture Question
If someone has professional pictures taken of their child who is 22 Months and 10 Days old could they count as 2 year old pictures (because perhaps they purchased SEVERAL of these pictures) or must that person shell out another hundred dollars for 2 year old pictures when the child has actually reached the age of two??
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I personally wouldn't pay more money if I had just had pictures taken because he probably won't change to much in the next two months. You can however do whatever is right for you but I thought I would give my thoughts.
His appearance won't change much in that short amount of time. I'd Count it as his 2 y/o photos and take your own on the big day. :)
I think that is up to you! Will you look back and say "THOSE are his 22 month pictures" if not then I say use the ones you have!
I would count it as 2 year old picture - as long as I took ONE at least on my digital for my keeping.
Heck I've been known to take 2 year old pictures at 30 months and count them as 2 and 3 year old pictures..........it wasn't of my first born of cours - Sorry middle child!
I would count it as two year old pics-- if you want to! If not-- go and get more taken... and if you want, I can take some "2" year old pictures for you too!
Hell yes they count.
Close enough. In ten years, nobody's gonna even know the difference. Heck, in 2 years, nobody's gonna know the difference.
I say yes, they count...but I'm a hypocrite bc I was all uptight about Brooklyn's pics she had done the day before she turned 8 months not REALLY being 8 month pics.
Post a Comment